News:

New Round added to ASRA schedule: VIR North Course

Main Menu

Vehicle Fatal Crash Statistics

Started by Biketographer, August 21, 2020, 06:13:39 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Biketographer

 I have some comments about this, below.



   NEW YORK, Aug. 20, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- The Ford F-Series pickup was involved in over 10,000 crashes over the past 5 years, making the top-selling pickup the most dangerous vehicle in America, according to a new report from ValuePenguin.com by LendingTree. The study identified the 25 cars, trucks and SUVs that are most likely to be in fatal crashes. Here are the key findings from the analysis:

       
  • The Ford F-Series was the most likely to be involved in fatal crashes: The Ford F-150 was involved in 10,845 fatal crashes over the past five years. Rounding up the five most dangerous behind the Ford F-150 are the Chevrolet Silverado (7,718 fatal crashes), Honda Accord (5,079 fatal crashes), Toyota Camry (4,734), and Ram Pickup Trucks (5,897 fatal crashes). 
  • The Ford Mustang does the worst job of protecting its occupants - 0.71 Mustang occupants are killed per fatal crash. Other cars where occupants did not fare well in fatal crashes include the Ford Taurus (0.7 occupants killed), the Honda Civic (0.7 occupants killed), the Ford Ranger (0.68 occupants killed) and the Ford Ranger (0.68 occupants killed).
  • While the deadliest individual models were pickups and SUVs, passenger cars are still involved in more crashes than any other type of passenger vehicle. A total of 100,388 passenger cars were involved in fatal crashes over the past five years. Pickups and SUVs are involved in 42,774, and 41,207, fatal crashes respectively. Minivans were in just 11,006 fatal crashes. 
  • Motorcycles account for 10% of fatal crashes, despite making up only 3% of registered vehicles. Additionally, the number of motorcycle occupants killed per crash is a staggering 0.98. This means that if a motorcyclist is involved in a fatal crash, the motorcyclist or their passenger is killed nearly every time.
  • Cars between 10 and 15 years old are involved in the most fatal crashes, while newer models were involved in fewer crashes. A large part of this comes down to car manufacturers continually improving safety features like collision avoidance technology.
ValuePenguin.com analysts collected data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and car manufacturers to determine which vehicles are most often involved in fatal crashes. To view the full report, visit: https://www.valuepenguin.com/top-deadliest-vehicles
   
The Deadliest Vehicles in the United States
Rank
Make
Model
Total fatal
crashes

Units sold in
2018

Occupants killed per vehicle in a
fatal crash

1
Ford
F-Series
10,845
909,330
0.46
2
Chevrolet
Silverado
7,718
585,581
0.47
3
Honda
Accord
5,079
291,071
0.65
4
Toyota
Camry
4,734
343,439
0.59
5
Ram
Pickup
5,897
536,980
0.43
6
Honda
Civic
4,397
325,760
0.7
7
Toyota
Corolla
3,430
303,732
0.64
8
Ford
Explorer
3,332
261,571
0.61
9
Nissan
Altima
3,267
209,146
0.6
10
GMC
Sierra
3,245
219,554
0.48
11
Chevrolet
Impala
2,804
56,556
0.68
12
Ford
Ranger
2,476
Not sold in 2018
0.68
13
Chevrolet
Malibu
2,345
144,542
0.64
14
Jeep
Grand Cherokee
2,304
224,908
0.52
15
Ford
Focus
2,256
114,045
0.68
16
Chevrolet
Tahoe
2,113
104,152
0.5
17
Ford
Mustang
1,963
75,842
0.71
18
Ford
Taurus
1,913
40,341
0.7
19
Chevrolet
Gmt-400
1,851
Not sold in 2018
0.63
20
Toyota
Tacoma
1,763
245,659
0.54
21
Ford
Escape
1,700
272,228
0.52
22
Nissan
Sentra
1,561
213,046
0.67
23
Ford
Fusion
1,550
173,600
0.53
24
Honda
Cr-V
1,526
379,013
0.53
25
Jeep
Wrangler
1,513
240,032
0.51
About ValuePenguin.com: ValuePenguin.com, part of LendingTree (NASDAQ: TREE), is a personal finance website that conducts in-depth research and provides objective analysis to help guide consumers to the best financial decisions. ValuePenguin focuses on value, assessing whether the return of a particular decision is worth the cost or risk of that option, and how this stacks up with the other possible choices they may have. For more information, please visit www.valuepenguin.com, like our Facebook page or follow us on Twitter @ValuePenguin.
When in traffic:  "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" or, just a simple mistake.

Biketographer

Let's use our brains a little bit to analyze what that report means.
My first question about their statistics is;  they report crashes which involved a fatality, does this mean these stats are for crashes when one, or more, persons in the listed vehicle died?  Or does it include stats for when someone died in any of the vehicles involved in the crash?

Motorcycles involved in fatal crashes; 98% of the people on the motorcycle died.  If these stats are only for vehicles when 1 or more people died in/on that vehicle, then obviously, as the average number of occupants of the vehicle goes down towards 1, then the  'occupants killed per fatal crash' would go to 1.  How often do you see two people on a motorcycle? 
Let's compare that to a vehicle not even listed - a school bus.   Suppose school busses average 50 passengers when involved in a fatal crash.  If there was a single fatality, that would put it on this chart as 0.02   Pickup trucks, being more likely to be a vehicle involved in working, have a very high percentage of time with only one occupant, so of course, the 'occupants killed per fatal crash' would be higher.
If a loaded school bus with 90 kids on it rear-ends a motorcycle with 1 rider, and the motorcyclist is killed, how did this 'study' count that fatality?

What I see as the most important part of this report is the data that they have not reported !  I would find it informative if they reported fatalities per crash and also reported the percentage of those vehicle crashes per mile.  If there are only two one-passenger Acme-super-car in the country and one is involved in a fatal crash, it would be misleading to report that it has a fatality rate of 100%.


When in traffic:  "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" or, just a simple mistake.

SVbadguy

These stats are just retarded.

How is the number of X vehicles sold in a year the least bit relevant to the number of fatalities occurring in X model when I highly doubt the fatality count is limited to those vehicles sold that same year?


Of course there is going to be a higher fatality count with Ford trucks.  Nearly a million F-150s alone sold every year.