Trivia

[gma]

Roughly 7.5 - making it slightly basic, rather than acidic.

What did I win?

:)

[spyderchick]

According to recent studies on preventing epidemics, how many degrees of separation from ground zero outbreak to widespead disease?

[gma]

Four.

And why are only the three of us doing this?

[spyderchick]

Four.

And why are only the three of us doing this?

Ah, you are correct, oh wise one.

Is that a rhetorical question?  ;D I would assume because no cares about trivial, yet useful information. (Or the obvious answer, which is: they haven't a clue) :o ;) ;D

Now, for the real conumdrum: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck?

[Dawn]

As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

 ;D

[spyderchick]

As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

 ;D

 ;D Yes, but what is the scientific formula for weight(i.e.mass) of said woodchuck to lumber chucked?

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

[Zac]

;D Yes, but what is the scientific formula for weight(i.e.mass) of said woodchuck to lumber chucked?

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Mdot_wood=e*M_chuck

M_wood=Mdot_wood*t



where:

M_wood = mass of wood chucked

Mdot_wood = time derivitive of M_wood

M_chuck = mass of the woodchuck

e = the specific (mass normalized) chucking efficency factor for the woodchuck in question, in units of inverse time.  This would be found using empirical data from a study of woodchucks.

The above equations are written assuming a constant Mdot.  They could be rewritten for an Mdot that varies as a function of t (i.e., the woodchuck slows down his chucking when he gets tired).

The REAL question is if the woodchuck gets dizzy while spinning on the wood lathe...

-z.

[spyderchick]

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

[Hyperdyne_Racing]

Wouldn't it be an easier question if :

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

 ;D

[Burt Munro]

Wouldn't it be an easier question if :

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

 ;D

That depends on your definition of "chucking." Chucking, as in heaving or tossing?  Or Chucking as in vomiting?  Or do heaving, tossing, vomiting and chucking all describe the same action? ;D ;D

[Burt Munro]

Roughly 7.5 - making it slightly basic, rather than acidic.

What did I win?

:)

Actually it's closer to 7.6
    
Which you should be aware of Griff, considering all the broken hearts you've left with tear stained pillows! ;D

[spyderchick]

Actually it's closer to 7.6
    
Which you should be aware of Griff, considering all the broken hearts you've left with tear stained pillows! ;D

OMG! Too funny!