Motorcycle Racing Forum

Racing Discussion => Racing Discussion => Topic started by: russ1962 on February 05, 2006, 12:08:10 PM

Title: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: russ1962 on February 05, 2006, 12:08:10 PM
Looking for opinions and knowledge.  Selling my 636 and looking to "step down" a bit, and wonder which of these bikes is the best to buy for 2006.

Opinions?

(my 636 is for sale in the classifieds)
http://www.racemotorcycles.com/cgi-bin/board/YaBB.pl?board=ccsclass;action=display;num=1138991290

Russ
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: ninelives59 on February 05, 2006, 12:11:43 PM
roadracing worlds new issue will cover all your questions.They have an article on both this month.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: russ1962 on February 05, 2006, 12:12:53 PM
....  and how about the SV650 vs. the SV650S?

What's the difference, besides the 650S being about $550 more?

Russ
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: tshort on February 05, 2006, 12:50:43 PM
Just read a review about this in current issue of Cycleworld - sounds like it will be off the pace considerably compared to SV, at least in terms of stock HP and 1/4 mile figures.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: grasshopper on February 05, 2006, 12:55:45 PM
The SV at "THIS" point in time is the better way to go. There is more aftermarket backup for the SV, more knowledge about setup, tips, and tricks. The aftermarket is endless.

Time will tell if the following will be the same for the little Kawasaki.

Go with the SV, buy one all race prepped, you should be able to find one for a decent price this time of year
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: Super Dave on February 05, 2006, 06:27:09 PM
I think Russ will probably start with a clean, reliable new one that he can have professionally race prepped by the people he's worked with for some time.  And who've done some good work in the past.

Russ, I don't think anyone really knows.  The Kawi's make more power in the 600 class than Yami's and Suzuki's...but there aren't a lot of them winning under consistent conditions locally.  

So, although the RRW article does say that in street trim they are different, with the Suzuki having an advantage, until some get out there, I don't think anyone can really say.

Some clip-ons, shock and fork work, proper geometry, race tires, etc...

Hey, they race Harley's too.

Russ, does your wife have something to do with the ability to get autograph cards made?
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: PJ721 on February 05, 2006, 06:35:14 PM
RRW puts the SV above the Kawi for track/race use....
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: lbk on February 06, 2006, 05:05:02 AM
On top of the article, the things I noticed about the Kawi looking at one in a dealership are.

First I don't know how you'd get a set of clip on's on that bike. Second those rearsets are just going to be a pain for aftermarket guys which will probably mean a higher price. Non adjustable front forks, that even worse than the stock SV front end.

As far as the SV goes, Did they ever get the engine failures resolved on the newer models?

SV's are great bikes if they haven't resolved the engine troubles go with a first gen. You can find them dirt cheap ready to go, and still competitive.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: Zac on February 06, 2006, 08:04:38 AM
QuoteOn top of the article, the things I noticed about the Kawi looking at one in a dealership are.

First I don't know how you'd get a set of clip on's on that bike. Second those rearsets are just going to be a pain for aftermarket guys which will probably mean a higher price. Non adjustable front forks, that even worse than the stock SV front end.


Clip ons won't fit with stock bodywork, but I know the Catalyst bodywork (and probably most others) is designed around clip-ons.  The rearsets won't be a big deal either, once you remove the stock ones, the aftermarket ones will be pretty conventional and similar to most other bikes.  I'm currently machining up a set, and I've seen another 650R with simple adapter plates to allow rearsets from another bike to fit.

I think the Kawi has a lot of potential.  The engine is super compact.  I haven't read the RRW article yet, but most of the magazine complaints I've read all concerned things that the average racer would change (handlebars, rearsets, brakepads, heavy choking exhaust, shock, fork internals).  In full supersport trim I don't think it will be at any disadvantage to a similarly prepared SV.

We are currently starting up a spec class for the bike with ASMA (very limited mods, even requiring the stock exhaust), so we'll see how they work.

-z.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: lbk on February 06, 2006, 10:09:42 AM
QuoteClip ons won't fit with stock bodywork, but I know the Catalyst bodywork (and probably most others) is designed around clip-ons.  The rearsets won't be a big deal either, once you remove the stock ones, the aftermarket ones will be pretty conventional and similar to most other bikes.  I'm currently machining up a set, and I've seen another 650R with simple adapter plates to allow rearsets from another bike to fit.

I think the Kawi has a lot of potential.  The engine is super compact.  I haven't read the RRW article yet, but most of the magazine complaints I've read all concerned things that the average racer would change (handlebars, rearsets, brakepads, heavy choking exhaust, shock, fork internals).  In full supersport trim I don't think it will be at any disadvantage to a similarly prepared SV.

We are currently starting up a spec class for the bike with ASMA (very limited mods, even requiring the stock exhaust), so we'll see how they work.

-z.

Ok, but what about the subframe and frame being one? That's going to be an expensive fix in case of a crash, and no option to lose weight by switching to an aluminum subframe.

I'm not trying to rip on the bike, I like it and was excited to see it in, but there it definitely has some items that I wouldn't be too fond of.

Also I read about the spec class for them, that's actually pretty exciting to me, and if it takes off and there are enough riders on the grid, that could definitely be a fun racing experience.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: damico on February 06, 2006, 10:23:59 AM
lbk beat me to the punch. Bending the subframe on the kwak would suck. You could cut it off and weld (easy cuz the frame is steel) tabs to mount a different subframe but then is it still ss legal?
The crank in parrallel twins is always a sore spot at high stress levels, it looks like a jump rope ( the big arch). If you build them big or rev the piss out of it the tend to brake. Ask Brian Lacy about this he used to race an EX and had lots of failures.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: weggie_man on February 06, 2006, 08:11:55 PM
For this year the SV has to be the way to go.

I know some WERA people are planning to run the Kaw. Wait a year and see what comes of that one. Maybe Kaw will step it up next year.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: jarelj on February 06, 2006, 11:23:51 PM
I was pretty happy with mine at the first track test at JenningsGP a couple weeks ago.  With bone-stock motor/exhaust I had no trouble hanging with the SV's on the back straight.  Handling was good, felt a lot like the SV but transitions side-side quicker.  That was with penske shock and emulators in the forks.  I've got a 636 front end on it now, will try that out at Hallett next month.  Woodcraft has rearsets coming out next week, price is comparable to other models.  I'll be chopping the subframe off of mine and just get rid of it, possible bolt on a small aluminum piece.  With a superbike tail, it really doesn't need much of a subframe since with the underneath exhaust you don't need a subframe for hanging the pipe.  It will be interesting to see how many are on the track this year, I suspect not many, but we'll see.  
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: Jeff on February 07, 2006, 04:56:29 AM
I don't race either, and never have, so my perspective Russ, is much like yours (feeling/speculation).

From *MY* perspective, the SV would be my choice based simply upon the PROVEN reliability/setup/etc of the bike, and sheer volume of knowledge & available resources for the SV.

The kaw may be the bike in a couple years, but for now, I don't think you can go wrong with the SV...

If you're up for being a guinea pig with the Kaw, and can bring along a ton of spares (knowing nobody in the pits will have anything to loan you in a pinch), then sure, go with the kaw.  However, if you want some known ground to work with, the SV is the choice...

Just my $.02.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: fourandsix on February 07, 2006, 09:11:33 AM
Buy the Kawi , it is closer to the farm animals you covet all the time , Yes i know it isn't a sheep but what the heck!
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: 4and6_whit on February 07, 2006, 11:01:44 AM
this is high praise coming from a real expert on farm animals. ;D
If you like challenges get the kaw if not get the suzuki.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: russ1962 on February 07, 2006, 12:02:14 PM
QuoteBuy the Kawi , it is closer to the farm animals you covet all the time , Yes i know it isn't a sheep but what the heck!

Hmmm, this is going to get interesting....

Jim, I'm curious about your new word..  "covet"?  This is a step up from your normal grunts, da's, um's...  you know, the usual sounds you emit.  Did someone else write that for you?  No more sheep for me, Jim.  Not since I've met you.

If I have to buy the Kawi, tell me you'll offer to make it go real fast?  For some reason, the Kawi makes me think I've stepped back in time about 10 years.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: fourandsix on February 07, 2006, 03:52:16 PM
The thing is Russ you have ridden 600's for a long time you have to consider how the twin will feel slow to you. If you want a twin , yes the Kaw is the way to go. Arata has tested one and with just a pipe it is almost at 80hp.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: Protein Filled on February 07, 2006, 04:46:18 PM
With all this talk, I may need to get the ole "94 hp SV" out and run it next year..  ;D.
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: K3 Chris Onwiler on February 07, 2006, 06:01:07 PM
QuoteWith all this talk, I may need to get the ole "94 hp SV" out and run it next year..  ;D.
At last, the true expert on farm animals speaks up....
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: grasshopper on February 08, 2006, 04:20:02 AM
Quoteyes the Kaw is the way to go. Arata has tested one and with just a pipe it is almost at 80hp.


I call BS!!!!   Prove me wrong!!!! Show proof!!!
Title: Re: Kaw 650R Ninja vs. SV650
Post by: badmonkey on February 08, 2006, 04:23:42 AM
 Arata has tested one and with just a pipe it is almost at 80hp.
What they didnt tell you is on there dyno it made 78hp stock ....LOL