Motorcycle Racing Forum

Racing Discussion => Racing Discussion => Topic started by: x2468 on December 18, 2005, 07:39:07 PM

Title: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: x2468 on December 18, 2005, 07:39:07 PM
http://www.reevu.com/

i could see how it might give one an advantage but also distract.
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: Jeff on December 19, 2005, 04:10:59 AM
Don't see why it wouldn't be legal...  

But as you fixate on the guy behind you and go straight off into (insert your favorite turn here), you might question the worth...

Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: TommyG on December 19, 2005, 05:13:39 AM
Only guy I know that can use it would be Mladin! That way he could back off once he couldn`t see anyone anymore!
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: Super Dave on December 19, 2005, 05:37:28 AM
Isn't going to be a legal helmet unless it has proper certification for DOT, BSE, or Snell standards.
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: papo600rr on December 19, 2005, 06:55:52 AM
I wouldnt buy it....im only looking ahead not behind me
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: chris_chops on December 19, 2005, 01:12:31 PM
KEANU REEVES????  If I could only matrix from turn 1 all the way to turn 7. 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

would that be legal?
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: lilroy on December 19, 2005, 05:27:26 PM
I plan on using one next season.  I will be riding backwards and using GP shifting to help keep things straight.  I'm working very closely with Polar-Optics to develope a polarized shield for the rear view lense. ;D
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: MJFRacing on December 19, 2005, 07:15:06 PM
QuoteIsn't going to be a legal helmet unless it has proper certification for DOT, BSE, or Snell standards.

Yup. Buy an Arai, Suomy, Shark or Shoei (etc.) and live to race again.
Title: Re: would this be race legal????????????
Post by: Rick Beggs on December 19, 2005, 07:27:26 PM
there is a rule against mirrors, that could be used against this,