Attn: Duc racers...could it be???

Started by skiandclimb, September 16, 2009, 11:16:44 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cowboy 6

Quote from: 123user on September 23, 2009, 08:09:30 AM
Lobbying for reclassification to make a 10 year old bike competetive in some class isn't always welcome change.

Its just upping the ante... in a class where it should be backed down.

+1 here. Well stated.
C6

www.NeedGod.com  ....   www.TPOParts.com  ....   www.Christiansportbike.com.com ....  www.woodcraft-cfm.com ....  www.ebcbrakes.com ....www.baxleycompanies.com

backMARKr

I know its been said already ( I know I have said it already, here and elsewhere)....if you want to be more competitive --- GET  A MORE COMPETITIVE BIKE. 

If an individual can't afford  a more competitive bike.....maybe it's time to consider whether that individual should be racing at all....OR

run what you have and be happy where you finish, taking heart in the fact that you are out there at all.

I really do think it is just that simple....



NFC Racin',Woodcraft, Pitbull,M4, SUDCO,Bridgestone
WERA #13

Racer510

You are so insightful, Mark. I wish I could think like you?

backMARKr

Quote from: Racer510 on September 23, 2009, 01:41:11 PM
You are so insightful, Mark. I wish I could think like you?

DAMMIT JAMIE... :banghead:
NFC Racin',Woodcraft, Pitbull,M4, SUDCO,Bridgestone
WERA #13

funsizeracing

Becka
CMRA EX #126
TipToes and TonkaTrucks Mini Endurance #75
CCS EX #126
www.caferacerinc.com
R&R Tool & Die Co.
www.ducatiomaha.com

Super Dave

#41
748's in lightweight?  Better let the F2's in.  FZR's and maybe F3's.

996's in Middleweight?  Better let in the TL-R's and SV1000's.  RC51? 
Super Dave

backMARKr

Quote from: Super Dave on September 23, 2009, 05:43:09 PM
748's in lightweight?  Better let the F2's in.

996's in Middleweight?  Better let in the TL-R's and SV1000's.  RC51? 

already got a TL....just sittin here....
NFC Racin',Woodcraft, Pitbull,M4, SUDCO,Bridgestone
WERA #13

skiandclimb

Quote from: Super Dave on September 23, 2009, 05:43:09 PM
748's in lightweight?  Better let the F2's in.  FZR's and maybe F3's.

996's in Middleweight?  Better let in the TL-R's and SV1000's.  RC51? 

To be honest, Dave- I couldn't agree more.
#730 CCS MW/GP
Pursuit Racing, The Backstopper's Org.
www.cyclehouseperformance.com - St. Louis, MO.
King Edward's Chicken and Fish- St. Louis, MO.
www.mcraracing.com

Super Dave

Quote from: skiandclimb on September 23, 2009, 07:37:00 PM
To be honest, Dave- I couldn't agree more.
It makes sense for AHRMA.  Not for CCS where "current" production bikes are the norm.  It gets more messy every year.  Would be easier just to categorized riders as slow, intermediate, and fast and run what you have.  But it will continue down this path.

Super Dave

HAWK

Quote from: Woofentino Pugrossi on September 21, 2009, 11:23:50 PM
Shut ups yous. :biggrin:


"Hey control, 413 is leaking, may wanna blackflag him. :lmao:

My mistake, after checking my facts you are indeed correct Rob.
Paul Onley
CCS Midwest EX #413

SV88

This is all moot to me.  Everybody keeps telling me that I should be keeping up with most experts on my 76hp ss sv and I actually believe them.   Just need much more track time (I'm a slow learner) and new tires!!
Fastsv650/SVR6/Steve sv23
09R6rdrace,13KTM250xc enduro,03SV1000N, 99-02 sv650 project
ret. CCS MW/FL/SE 88  Moto A SSP 881

tstruyk

QuoteI merely want to be able to run a few more classes, other than just Supertwins, where I could have a chance at competing.

sell your duc, buy an SV

Compete in ULW, LWss, LWsb, LWgp, GTL, Supertwins and Thunderbike

I betcha you can find a pretty well sorted SS SV for 3k...

CCS GP/ASRA  #85
2010 Sponsors: Lithium Motorsports, Probst Brothers Racing, Suspension Solutions, Pirelli, SBS, Vortex

"It is incredible what a rider filled with irrational desire can accomplish"