Cheaters @ Summit Point

[cornerjunkie]

On a personal level, I am not happy with the fact that I lost out on points and possibly Pirelli money in three of my races because of these two guys.  What if at the end of the season, I am a few points short of becoming an expert and I miss out because these guys stole my points?  I am especially unhappy with the fact that I finally got wood (third place), but that it should really be a second place.  I want my second place plaque!

[Ducmarc]

the plaque and the points yes but do you really want to go expert I'm going to try to stay amateur as long as I can. but I'm old and slow.

[rogers1323]

If you're having second place finishes then you should be an expert next year.  And unless you only show up to 3, maybe 4 weekends, then you won't have to worry about it.  I'd like to have enough points to go expert by the end of the memorial day weekend at Summit, but if not then certainly by the end of the weekend at Roebling.  It's really not that hard as long as you can finish top 10 pretty consistently.

[xseal]

Also it would be nice to see what the penalty is and put them out here publicly to deter others from doing the same thing.

+1

[yetidave]

I see that the points have been updated to include those from Summit, but the results page still looks the same. So I assume these two got to keep their results.

[bambam]

 soooo inquiring minds want to know what the outcome of all of this was. can someone please postthe official outcome or decision made by ccs management?

[YellowDesmo998]

I hate to say this because I always had respect for the way CCS was run but this entire "hush, hush" policy is bunk!

CCS needs to do what's right for the majority of their racing community that adheres by the rules and continually supports CCS with our race and licenses fees.

When we perceive CCS is hiding something and/or not taking the correct steps when dealing with cheaters, it's makes it hard to throw down race fees, travel costs, track fees etc. for a CCS event when we won't know it the cheater that took the place/cash/points in front of us will be punished or rewarded.

No mater what the outcome, please tell the public what was done in this situation.  You owe us, your customers, that much.

[Les Lambert]

+1 one to that 

I haven't spoke up until now.  But, i was knocked out of some Pirelli money because of these fools in the Unlimited Superbike race not to mention some points.

So yes CCS should take the appropriate action to make sure that the honest racers are not penalized one tiny bit whether its contingency money or race finishes.  That would just send out bad vibes throughout the entire racing community and leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth.

[Crazy Horse]

One thing to me that seems odd is the name Kang/Kenny. Why did he use different names if it was not intentional or at least know what he was doing was wrong.

[Mongo]

His name is Kang, he's called Kenny.  He was originally listed as Kang Lu with us, then Kang "Kenny" Lu, now just Kenny since that's what he's called.  Kind of like Tray Batey's first name isn't really Tray.

[REM6a]

So no official news is going to be resealed or rules implemented to control this from happening again?

bummer.

[njracer]

I wonder how this would have been handled if it happened to poster #99's org??  I doubt it would just be brushed under the rug and forgotten.

[rogers1323]

Any dissatisfaction at this point needs to remain directed towards our lack of knowledge about and/or inclusion in the result of this.  We should not assume that anything has been brushed under the rug or forgotten.  I would also love to know what the outcome of this was, but I understand their position and policy towards making things public knowledge.  There definitely should not be an assumption made that these two were not punished.  I got the impression from Eric's last post that they were punished, he just couldn't give us the details about what that punishment was.

[HAWK]

I said it before and I'll say it again. Once they abused the cloak of secrecy they lost all claim to privacy in my mind.

[tigerblade]

It would be like a highway patrolman quietly following a person to his destination, then giving him a ticket in private, out of sight of other motorists.  Half the point is to deter others from doing wrong.  The org doesn't have to issue a public beat-down, but after the facts are in, people should be informed of what happened.  My two pennies...